Klobuchar’s Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Children From Furniture Tip-Over Injuries Advances in the Senate

Source: United States Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn)

 The bipartisan STURDY Act would strengthen furniture safety standards to prevent children from being injured by fatal furniture tip-overs

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) announced that her bipartisan legislation to protect children from furniture tip-over injuries passed the Senate Commerce Committee unanimously by voice vote. 

The STURDY Act, which Klobuchar originally introduced alongside Senators Casey (D-PA), and Blumenthal (D-CT), and is co-sponsored by Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO), strengthens furniture safety standards to prevent children from being injured by fatal furniture tip-overs. Each year, nearly 10,000 children go to the ER as a result of furniture tip-over injuries. 

“No family should live in fear that their child could be severely injured or even killed by preventable accidents,” said Klobuchar. “By strengthening our furniture safety standards, the STURDY Act will help protect more children from the risks of furniture tip-overs. Now that this bill has advanced through the Senate Commerce Committee with bipartisan support, I look forward to it passing the full Senate and being signed into law.” 

In April, Klobuchar held a press conference with representatives from the Children’s Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis, and furniture tip-over prevention advocate Janet McGee to highlight resources to protect children from tip-over injuries. McGee, of Eagan, Minnesota, lost her 22-month-old son, Teddy, in 2016 after a dresser toppled over while he was taking a nap.

Klobuchar’s legislation would direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to set mandatory rules for manufacturers to prevent furniture tip-overs, including requiring companies to test their products for safety and stability before being sold. The bill has been endorsed by consumer groups, Parents Against Tip-overs, and manufacturers and retailers like IKEA, Room & Board, Crate & Barrel, and Williams-Sonoma.

###

VIDEO – On Senate Floor, Klobuchar Emphasizes Importance of Protecting Women’s Freedom To Make Their Own Healthcare Decisions

Source: United States Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn)

VIDEO – On Senate Floor, Klobuchar Emphasizes Importance of Protecting Women’s Freedom To Make Their Own Healthcare Decisions

Klobuchar: “For the first time in generations, we may live in a world where women have fewer rights than their moms or their grandmas. That’s not the world that we want.”

WATCH KLOBUCHAR FULL REMARKS HERE

WASHINGTON – On the Senate floor, U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for the passage of the Women’s Health Protection Act, emphasizing the importance of protecting women’s freedom to make their own health care decisions, following the leaked Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade

“Congress must act to codify the principles of Roe v. Wade into law,” said Klobuchar. “These protections are desperately needed and it is our responsibility to take action so that this fundamental right remains real for the women and the men who stand with them across this country.”

Highlighting the consequences of the reported Supreme Court decision, Klobuchar continued: “For the first time in generations, and I want young people out there to think of this, we may live in a world where women have fewer rights than their moms or their grandmas. That’s not the world that we want.”

The full transcript of Klobuchar’s remarks as delivered are given below, available for TV download HERE, and for online viewing HERE.

Madam President, I come to the floor today at a pivotal time for women’s rights in this country. I want to thank Senator Blumenthal and Murray and many others, including Senator Baldwin, for their leadership on this issue and on the Women’s Health Protection Act.          

We learned last week, Mr. President, that it is very likely that the Supreme Court will overrule Roe v. Wade. 

The leaked opinion made it clear. It means the Supreme Court is on track to completely overrule Roe, stripping women of their constitutional right to seek an abortion. It will also be, I note, against the wishes of the somewhere between 70 and 80 percent of Americans who believe that this is a decision that should be made between a woman and her doctor. Not with Senator Cruz, not a bunch of politicians in Washington, but a decision that should be made between a woman and her doctor. 

50 years stripped away of women’s rights. And the fall, Mr. President, will be swift. Over 20 states already have laws in place that could be used to restrict access, including 13 which will automatically go into effect if the Supreme Court issues the decision. 

We have also seen states preparing to take even more extreme steps if Roe is overturned. Last week, Republican lawmakers in Louisiana advanced a bill to immediately classify abortion as a homicide and allow the state to prosecute women – prosecute women – for receiving care. 

Earlier this year, a bill was introduced by Republican legislatures in Missouri to allow private citizens to sue people who help women leave the state to get care.

This comes on top of the 19 states that already have laws in place to ban or restrict access to medication abortion.

What this all comes down to is a fundamental question: Who is making these personal decisions —  politicians, or a woman? And are women equal citizens under the law? 

If Roe is overturned, women in this country will receive different treatment under the law than men – and our access to critical care will be at the mercy of a patchwork of laws. 

We have all seen what happens on the ground when these kinds of restrictions are enacted. Texas law last year denies access to at least 85 percent of patients seeking abortion-related services, some women in Texas have had to drive nearly 250 miles one way to get care. 

No one should have to take a bus across the country to make a personal health care decision. A woman in Louisiana or in Missouri or in Texas should not be treated differently than a woman in Minnesota. 

While we are all deeply disturbed by the impact this decision will have on women and the men who stand with them, unfortunately, many of us have seen this coming.

Republicans have been methodically preparing for this moment—stacking the courts with judges who want to overturn Roe, and introducing over 500 bills in states across the country limiting access to care.

While this is still a draft decision, I am seriously concerned that the Court’s apparent willingness to disregard nearly 50 years of rights will not only put women’s health at risk, but will undermine the rule of law. 

This draft leaked opinion brings us back to the 50’s. The issue is we always thought it would be the 1950’s, when it is truly the 1850’s. And the people of this country do not want to go backwards when it comes to their freedoms. Because that is what this is about – their freedoms to make their own decisions.

So what can the Senate do in the face of this threat to freedom?

All three branches of government have a responsibility to protect people’s rights. And if one branch doesn’t do its job, that’s how this system was set up constitutionally, then it’s up to another to step in.

Congress must act to codify the principles of Roe v. Wade into law – and we will have the opportunity to do just that on the floor today when we cast our votes on the Women’s Health Protection Act. 

These protections are desperately needed and it is our responsibility to take action so that this fundamental right remains real for the women and the men who stand with them across this country – freedom, equality under the law.  

For the first time in generations, and I want young people out there to think of this, we may live in a world where women have fewer rights than their moms or their grandmas. That’s not the world that we want.

I urge my colleagues to stand up with the majority of Americans who support a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions or freedom to make her decisions by enshrining the protections of Roe v. Wade into law. 

###

Sens. Cramer, Marshall, Colleagues Demand NEPA Review of Biden Administration’s Undefined 30×30 Initiative

Source:

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Kevin Cramer (R-ND), member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, and Roger Marshall (R-KS) led 19 colleagues in a letter to White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Chair Brenda Mallory demanding they adhere to the National Environmental Policy Act requirements and undergo the proper analysis and public comment period for the Biden Administration’s goal of conserving at least 30 percent of our lands and waters by 2030, otherwise known as “30×30.” 

“To reach 30 percent by 2030, hundreds of millions of acres of land and water will be impacted. A program of this magnitude requires solid legal authority and a clear plan, yet the Administration has articulated neither, leaving our constituents in the dark. What is clear, however, is the Departments are implementing the 30×30 initiative without first analyzing the program’s public and environmental impact, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We are calling on you to refrain from any actions in the furtherance of 30×30 until a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been completed and the legal authority under which this major federal program is proceeding has been disclosed,” wrote the senators. 

The letter argues 30×30, which despite the promises of transparency and consultation is moving forward without public input, constitutes a major federal action and is thus subject to NEPA to ensure federal agencies identify and carefully consider the program’s impact on the environment, economy, and those affected.

“Without full disclosure of the details of the 30×30 program, its environmental, budgetary, and legal impacts remain unknown and the public is left in the dark. This is hardly the open and transparent process the Administration promised,” wrote the senators. 

The letter also requests the Departments provide the exact legal authority the Biden Administration is using to carry out this initiative by June 15, 2022.

“At minimum, it is the Administration’s obligation to provide a plan, legal justification, and venue for the public to participate,” continued the senators.

Senators Cramer and Marshall are joined by Senators Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Jim Risch (R-ID), John Hoeven (R-ND), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Mitt Romney (R-UT), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Deb Fischer (R-NE), James Lankford (R-OK), John Thune (R-SD), John Cornyn (R-TX), and Ted Cruz (R-TX).

 Click here to read the letter. 

Sen. Cramer Votes to Uphold Sanctity of All Life, Opposes Democrats’ Abortion Bill

Source:

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) voted against Democrats’ radical abortion-on-demand bill. The bill would create nationwide right to abortion, regardless of the upcoming Supreme Court ruling of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. It would also pre-empt pro-life state laws, including North Dakota’s. 

“The right to life is our most fundamental right, most often taken for granted each day when we wake up and enjoy our lives. This extreme measure destroys protections for the most vulnerable by usurping states’ rights to protect life. The sanctity of life is not a political fight, but a fight for humanity itself. It is unconscionable for Democrats to not only attempt to legislate the legalization of abortion through all nine months of pregnancy, but also override the will of states and their citizens. I have always promised the people of North Dakota I would fight for life at all stages. I will always fulfill that promise,” said Senator Cramer.

In addition to permitting abortion through all nine months of pregnancy, the bill makes every state a late-term abortion state, invalidates laws currently in effect protecting pain-capable unborn children or protecting babies with heartbeats, forces states to allow mail-order abortions without an in-person visit, prohibits states from protecting babies from discriminatory abortions, invalidates laws preventing coerced abortions, and outlaws parental notification.

Background:

Last week, Senator Cramer issued a statement emphasizing the implications of the Supreme Court leak and underscoring his concern for the legitimacy, confidentiality, and independence of our highest court.

“The far left is attempting to bully justices into submission instead of letting the judicial branch perform their duties without influence or bias. The final decision has not been released and I will not speculate on its contents. However, the impact of this case cannot be overstated. Each and every life is precious and sacred and I will not shirk away from this conviction,said Senator Cramer.

Senator Cramer received an A+ rating from the Susan B. Anthony List for his strong legislative record supporting pro-life measures. In February, he voted against Abortion On Demand Until Birth Act, which would legalize abortion through all nine months of pregnancy while simultaneously striking down pro-life laws at the state and local level in North Dakota and across the country.

Senator Cramer also joined Senators Roger Wicker (R-MS), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), and over 200 members of Congress in filing an amicus brief supporting the State of Mississippi in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold Mississippi’s law protecting life.

In the 117th Congress, Senator Cramer has co-sponsored several pro-life bills including legislation to ban abortion after 20 weeks of fertilization, protect unborn babies who may be targeted for abortion because of their gender or physical condition, and give states the authority to exclude abortion providers like Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funds. He has also pledged to vote against any bill that would undermine the Hyde Amendment, which is a legislative provision barring the use of federal funds to pay for abortion or other abortion-related activities. 

Sen. Cramer Discusses Shipyard Infrastructure, Workforce Challenges at Joint Seapower Readiness Hearing

Source:

***Click here to download video. Click here for audio.***

***Click here to download opening statement video. Click here for opening statement audio.***

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Seapower Subcommittee, discussed Navy authorities, workforce development, and funding issues related to the Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program at a joint Seapower and Readiness and Management Support Subcommittee hearing.

Senator Cramer began by asking for recommendations on process streamlining and other authorities beneficial to update our Navy’s shipyard infrastructure.

“Do you have any advice for us in terms of policy, streamlining processes, authorizations, [or] funding? What have we learned so we can be helpful in making this process a little more efficient and effective?” asked Senator Cramer.

“[It would be helpful to have] authority which we have to pay for these mega projects to fund them incrementally over time, which you have provided us in the past. I think continuing that for these large projects, and potentially looking at maybe a multiyear type procurement like we do in the shipbuilding world, where we can see if we get the most efficiency by building a set of projects together in a multiyear contract. [These] are two authorities that might be worth looking at to get more flexibility and negotiating space to our team,” said Mr. Frederick Stefany, Principal Civilian Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition.

“The multiyear work relative to repair and maintenance is something we’re looking very closely at. These are complex projects and I sometimes think repair and maintenance could give the impression of less complexity, but really the multiyear relative to, say a drydock that we’re repairing, and the way that relates to a current operational availability is absolutely critical. Our ability to have a flexible approach, multiyear funding certainly is going to help us execute over time,” added Rear Admiral McClelland, Program Executive Officer for Industrial Infrastructure, U.S. Navy.

Senator Cramer also had a discussion on Naval efforts to increase recruitment and retention and what Congress could be doing to support this endeavor.

“There’s another challenge that we’re hearing from everybody. I mean, seasonal farm and hospitality workers to surgeons, very sophisticated technology workers and everything in between. We have a workforce challenge in our country right now, particularly in the private sector. I presume you’re experiencing the same thing. Do you have any thoughts? Let us know what you’re trying to do to recruit and retain employees at the yards. Also, is there anything you think we could be doing?” asked Senator Cramer.

“We’re seeing the same thing in the public yards as well. Our attrition rates are higher than what we had planned, our recruitment rates are lower than what we had planned. We offer some pretty good training as we bring people into the yards through our apprentice programs, so that’s one real positive,” responded Admiral McClelland. “The other thing that we’re looking at right now is wages for our entry level positions, and many times we’re competing at a wage that is less than what some businesses in the local area, for example, whether it be Amazon or even a Starbucks. Typically, the starting wage for some of our mechanics is in that $14 to $15 an hour range – right at the minimum wage level. What we’re finding is in some areas where shipyards are located, Portsmouth and Puget Sound in particular, the going wage is actually higher than that. So, we’re working through Navy leadership and with the human resources organizations across the Department of Defense to look at that wage grade we’re paying our folks.”

Senator Cramer also highlighted the Supplying Help to Infrastructure in Ports, Yards, and America’s Repair Docks (SHIPYARD) Act. The bill provides funding to make investments needed to optimize, improve, and rebuild shipyard facilities, electrical infrastructure, environmental systems, and the equipment of public and private shipyards in the U.S. that support the U.S. Navy fleet. 

“There are 18 cosponsors, a lot of them from this Committee, [on] the SHIPYARD Act, speaking of infrastructure and some additional resources. Could you just generally comment on the SHIPYARD Act, what you know about it, and what how helpful it may be?” asked Senator Cramer. “It’s always tough to apply the time value of money in appropriations processes by the government, but we need to get better.”

“The Navy supports that Act,” responded Secretary Stefany. “The idea of having a commitment of all the funding upfront and a period of time to spend the funding most efficiently. The knowledge that the total dollar value was there and could be worked with industry most effectively is a best practice. So we would absolutely support that.” 

Click Here to Watch 

In addition, Senator Cramer delivered the following opening remarks at the beginning of the hearing:

“Thank you Chairwoman Hirono, as well as Chairman Kaine and Ranking Member Sullivan, for agreeing to hold this hearing jointly to discuss a range of important naval shipyard issues that cross our subcommittee jurisdictions.

“As I think about our naval shipyards, it is striking to me how intertwined they are with our nation’s history – even before our independence. For instance, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, near and dear to Senator Kaine, was first established in 1767 under the British flag as Gosport Shipyard and seized seven years later during the Revolutionary War.

“In the 1790s, the U.S.S. Chesapeake, one of the first six U.S. Navy ships authorized and funded by Congress, was built there. Later, the first dry dock in the western hemisphere opened in 1833. Known as Dry Dock 1 and now a historic national landmark, it is still in use today. Think about that… it’s 189 years old and still used to maintain naval vessels.

“Suffice to say, our four public shipyards all have storied histories and are truly national infrastructure. Each is over 100 years old and showing its age. The poor condition of these shipyards is having a serious negative effect on fleet operations today and the bill has come due. This is not a future problem. It is here now and one we must work together to solve.

“While there is much to discuss, I plan to focus my question on how Congress can help in terms of authorities, workforce development, and funding. On the last point, I am hopeful that the bipartisan group of Senators working on the SHIPYARD Act, many of whom are in this room today, will be able to get it done. 

“I look forward to the testimony of our witnesses.”

HYDE-SMITH AGAIN VOTES TO BLOCK DEMOCRATS’ NATIONAL ABORTION ON DEMAND UNTIL BIRTH ACT

Source: United States Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss)

HYDE-SMITH AGAIN VOTES TO BLOCK DEMOCRATS’ NATIONAL ABORTION ON DEMAND UNTIL BIRTH ACT

Pro-Life Senators Stop Newest Radical Pro-Abortion Effort that Never Mentions Woman, Female or even Mother

PHOTO:  Senator Hyde-Smith Argued Against Democrats “Abortion on Demand” Legislation the First Time They Tried to Pass it. (Feb. 28, 2022)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) today issued the following statement after voting a second time this year to block a “Abortion on Demand Until Birth” Act (S.4132):

“Democrats and their pro-abortion allies are alarmed and in a mad rush to enshrine in federal law a virtually unlimited right to abort babies right up to their birth.  This misguided bill is just another facet of the radical abortion movement’s assault on the Supreme Court or any institution willing to protect the preborn.

“This so-called women’s health legislation only mentions ‘women’ in the title and never mentions the terms ‘woman,’ ‘female,’ or even ‘mother.’  Not only would it broaden support for the abortion industry, it would strike down reasonable state laws regarding informed consent, waiting periods, parental involvement and such.  I’m proud of my vote to once again stop another misguided and radical attempt to make abortion on demand until birth the law of the land.”

The Senate voted 49-51 to stop S.4132, which was rushed to the Senate floor after a draft opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was leaked from within the U.S. Supreme Court.  The measure required 60 votes to proceed.

Hyde-Smith, a Christian and pro-life advocate, voted against a similar House-passed pro-abortion bill (HR.3755) in February.  It, too, failed to receive sufficient support to advance in the legislative process.

###

   
  

MISS. DELEGATION WELCOMES $15 MILLION IN AIP GRANTS FOR MISSISSIPPI AIRPORTS

Source: United States Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss)

MISS. DELEGATION WELCOMES $15 MILLION IN AIP GRANTS FOR MISSISSIPPI AIRPORTS

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), and U.S. Representatives Steven Palazzo (R-Miss.) and Michael Guest (R-Miss.) today welcomed the announcement of more than $15 million in new investments from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for enhancement projects at 29 Mississippi airfields.

The grants come from the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), including entitlement and appropriated funding.

“Local airports are a critical part of our state’s economy. Their maintenance ensures that Mississippi can continue to grow and remain competitive,” Wicker said.  “I appreciate the FAA’s work on these projects and all they do to support aviation in Mississippi.”

“Local airports, which support jobs and bolster economies, require regular rehabilitation, construction, and safety projects,” said Hyde-Smith, who serves on the Senate Appropriations Committee.  “These FAA awards will fund targeted projects at airports across Mississippi to improve safety and operate more efficiently.”

“Continually improving the aviation infrastructure of Mississippi will aid in expanding tourism, furthering economic development, and ensuring our airports are safe and able to expand with demand,” said Palazzo.  “Investments in America’s infrastructure, such as these AIP grants, benefit the local community, the state, and the nation.”

“As a Member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, I’ve spoken with airport officials across the Third Congressional District about the important role airports play in economic development. These grants will help make Mississippi’s economy more competitive as we seek to attract and retain new businesses and investment. I join my colleagues in applauding the FAA for their support,” said Guest.

The 29 AIP grants for Mississippi airports include:

•   Monroe County, City of Aberdeen – $405,000 to reconstruct runway and taxiway lighting
•   Stennis International, City of Bay St. Louis – $300,000 to acquire miscellaneous land
•   Tishomingo County, City of Belmont – $290,925 to seal apron and runway pavement
•   Carthage-Leake County, City of Carthage – $94,000 to install navigational aid, rehabilitate airport beacon
•   Cleveland Municipal, City of Cleveland – $225,000 to reconstruct railway lighting 
•   Columbia/Marion County, City of Columbia – $80,000 to construct apron
•   Columbus-Lowndes County, City of Columbus – $399,348 to rehabilitate taxiway
•   Golden Triangle Regional, City of Columbus – $1,000,000 to improve contract tower, terminal building, install lighting and fencing
•   Roscoe Turner, City of Corinth – $67,500 to improve drainage and erosion control
•   Ruleville-Drew, City of Drew – $150,000 to Install navigation aid, seal runway an taxiway pavement
•   Greenville Mid-Delta, City of Greenville – $1,150,000 to seal runway pavement
•   Gulfport-Biloxi International, City of Gulfport – $2,598,525 to improve drainage and erosion seal taxiway pavement
•   Hattiesburg Bobby L. Chain Municipal, City of Hattiesburg – $150,000 to shift or reconfigure taxiway
•   Indianola Municipal, City of Indianola – $150,000 to rehabilitate taxiway and seal pavement
•   Iuka, City of Iuka – $174,375 for hangar improvements and construction
•   Hawkins Field, City of Jackson – $60,000 to conduct study
•   Louisville/Winston County, City of Louisville – $150,000 to acquire land for approaches
•   Magee Municipal, City of Magee – $486,180 to rehabilitate apron, taxilane, and taxiway
•   Key Field, City of Meridian – $1,922,918 to install runway guidance system, rehabilitate runway
•   Hattiesburg/Laurel Regional, City of Moselle – $914,274 to improve ARFF building
•   Hardy-Anders Field/Natchez-Adams County, City of Natchez – $1,095,000 to reconstruct airport beacon and runway lighting
•   University-Oxford, City of Oxford – $975,000 to reconstruct runway lighting, install navigational aids
•   Philadelphia Municipal, City of Philadelphia – $832,410 to reconstruct lighting
•   Pontotoc County, City of Pontotoc – $193,512 to install navigational aids, reconstruct airport beacon and lighting vault
•   Clarke County, City of Quitman – $103,500 to construct or improve fuel farm
•   Paul Pittman Memorial, City of Tylertown – $600,000 to acquire land, install perimeter fencing and guidance system
•   McCharen Field, City of West Point – $153,000 to acquire land
•   Dean Griffin Memorial, City of Wiggins – $69,480 to install perimeter fencing
•   Winona-Montgomery County, City of Winona – $291,893 to rehabilitate runway lighting

###

   
 
 

Graham to Attorney General Garland: Protect Supreme Court Justices, Enforce and Uphold the Law

Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Lindsey Graham

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) has written to Attorney General Merrick Garland pressing him to protect Supreme Court justices from threats of violence and protests taking place outside their residences.

Graham noted there is a federal law that prohibits, “picketing, parades or any other demonstrations outside federal courts or the homes of federal judges and justices that are conducted with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.”

Graham pressed Garland to enforce and uphold the law.

“Non-violent protests in front of the Supreme Court building are one thing, but protesting at the home of a justice is beyond the pale,” wrote Graham.  “Protests at a person’s home carry with them the implicit threat of violence and can be designed to stoke fear for their personal and their families’ safety…The angry protests in front of the homes of Justices Alito, Roberts, and Kavanaugh have been part of an immense public pressure campaign, directed at the Supreme Court, with the goal of influencing its final decision in the Dobbs case.”

Graham noted the protests were orchestrated by groups like Ruth Sent Us, which published a map on its website identifying where Justices Kavanaugh, Alito, Roberts, Barrett, Gorsuch and Thomas live.

“The Department of Justice should bring its resources to bear and enforce the statute that Congress passed to address circumstances like the ones playing out right now,” concluded Graham. “Supreme Court justices must be able to rule independently, without fear or favor. Their ability to do so is undermined by these protests. It is incumbent upon you to act and protect the integrity of the Supreme Court and the justices who serve on it. Please take that charge seriously.”

A full copy of Graham’s letter is available here.

####

Graham, Blumenthal Introduce Resolution on Russian State Sponsorship of Terrorism

Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Lindsey Graham

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) introduced a Senate resolution affirming that the United States Senate views the actions of the government of the Russian Federation, at the direction of President Vladimir Putin, as sponsoring acts of terrorism, and calls on the Secretary of State to designate the Russian Federation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST).

“Putin is a terrorist, and one of the most disruptive forces on the planet is Putin’s Russia,” said Graham. “Putin’s Russia deserves this designation. We should be all-in on making sure that Putin’s Russia is marginalized as long as they engage in this behavior. This resolution sends a strong message to Ukraine that we are listening and we agree that Putin runs a nation that is a state sponsor of terrorism. We are also letting the Russian people know that our fight is with Putin, and as long as he is your leader, engaging in these activities, you will be isolated on the world stage. I can’t think of a stronger signal at a more crucial time than Congress and the Biden Administration working together to designate Putin’s Russia a state sponsor of terrorism. Thank you to my colleague Senator Blumenthal for working with me on this resolution to make sure this moment does not pass.”

“Russia’s horrific inhumanity – including barbaric atrocities and war crimes – have richly earned its designation as a state sponsor of terrorism. I am proud to be leading this resolution with Senator Graham, applying stiffer sanctions and recognizing Russia as a true pariah among nations,” said Blumenthal.

The resolution puts the Senate on record as:

  • Viewing the actions of the Government of the Russian Federation, at the direction of President Vladimir Putin, as terrorism.
  • Calling on the Secretary of State to designate the Russian Federation as an SST.

The SST designation allows additional categories of sanctions to be placed on a country, including restrictions on U.S. foreign assistance, ban on defense exports and sales, certain controls over exports of dual-use items, and financial and other restrictions. If designated, Russia would join a small list of other countries who are designated SSTs: Cuba, North Korea, Iran, and Syria.

Both Ukrainian President Zelensky and the parliament of Ukraine have appealed to Congress to encourage the Department of State to recognize the Russian Federation as an SST. The justification for a Russian SST designation includes:

  • Russian combat troops supporting Syria (a designated SST country) in the Syrian Civil War.
  • Support of separatists (subnational groups) in the Donbas since 2014.
  • Poisoning of political enemies abroad.
  • Use of the Wagner Group to achieve foreign policy objectives globally.

The full text of the resolution can be found here.

#####

Graham on Biden Defense Budget

Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Lindsey Graham

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) today made this statement after a Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing on President Biden’s Fiscal Year 2023 funding request and budget justification for the Department of Defense. Graham’s full questioning of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley can be found here.

“Our military leadership is empowering the lowest defense spending in modern history at a time of great threat and danger to our nation and our allies.

“The Biden budget, supported by the Secretary of Defense, is woefully inadequate to address our defense needs. It only gets worse over time as the Biden proposal for a 10-year period would have defense spending in 2032 at 2.4% of GDP – by far the lowest in modern history.  The current budget of 3.1% GDP is also historically low.

“This budget is irresponsible and dead on arrival.”

Watch Graham’s Full Questions Here

#####